http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2011JE003841/pdf

I did a spreadsheet for the LRO-LAMP. Basically, if you multiply the soil mass abundances of Gladstone et al’s Table 1 atomic species by about 0.33, you’ll get the latest estimate. CO is 1.3% by mass, and H2 was 3.7% by mass of the high velocity (~3.5 km/s), high-angle (within ~15 degrees of vertical), total mass of which was estimated at 3150 kg.

Interestingly, the high-angle plume evidently had a higher kinetic energy than the Centaur impactor (2300 kg @ 2.5 km/s). Since the bulk velocity of the plume is pretty tightly constrained, either the estimate of the plume is too high, or something strange happened to add energy to the plume (possibly involving detonation of monatomic H, which if that’s the case, then PSR regolith is about as explosive as TNT…).

Also, we’ve learned that the high-velocity, high-angle plume was ejected much faster (within < 1 ms) than previously thought and probably much shallower (25 cm average depth) than originally thought.

The best compilation of the LCROSS data is in the articles in Science magazine:

Major analysis of plume from LCROSS shepherding satellite:

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6003/463.abstract

Some of the “corrected” data to which you refer is from the LRO-LAMP results:

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6003/472

Unfortunately, these articles are behind a paywall, but you can find the originals in any large public or university library. Also, I suggest that you contact the senior authors of these papers directly (their e-mails are given at the links above) and ask them for a reprint — virtually all authors of scientific papers are happy to do this as a courtesy.

I think if got depot which more than experimental, but got to point of being operational and getting to point before another decade is gone, that this could happen if it happens sooner rather than later, then perhaps commercial mining could begin within a decade.

I also think NASA needs a plan for ISS which does not include de-orbiting it. So ISS needs to be put in orbit which is more permanent.
So if within 5 years, a depot(s) is built and permanent solution for ISS can be arrived
at, perhaps this create environment where commercial lunar mining could begin with a decade. But this a bit unrealistic to expect NASA to move this fast.

Though it might not be something NASA does [or starts], European Space Agency might come to conclusion that only solution for Ariane and their spaceport is develop a depot in LEO.
Or longer odds of occurring any time soon, China decides it needs a depot in LEO.
Or maybe US military decides it needs a depot.